Sunday, 15 May 2016

2016 Staff at Beaverlodge - Hannah

Hey there! My name is Hannah, and I just finished my third year of Environmental Sciences at the University of British Columbia. My area of concentration is Ecology & Conservation, and if you’re having trouble locating me I’m probably taking a gander in the forest or mountains. 

I have just completed my second week with the IPM team at Beaverlodge Research Farm and I have already learned many things, including deploying diamondback moth pheromone traps, flea beetle sticky traps (Figure 1), and pea leaf weevil pitfall traps. I have also had the opportunity to process samples collected from these traps and observe these little fellas under the microscope. An important part of pest management research is the preservation of samples for further studies, and I have had an introduction to how to preserve samples in ethanol as well as drying and pinning specimens. 


Figure 1. Deploying flea beetle sticky traps along the edge of the field.

Along with collecting and processing samples, I also have learned the importance of disease control, specifically of clubroot in crops in the Brassica family. Clubroot is caused by a protist pathogen that induces a gall on the roots of canola and related crops. The pathogen inhibits water and nutrient uptake and results in stunting, wilting, and can eventually cause severe yield losses. The spores can stay dormant within the soil for up to twenty years and it is near impossible to eradicate which is why the control of clubroot is so important. Because of this, we wear sanitary booties in the field in order to prevent the spread of soil from one site to another. Clubroot is an example of one aspect of IPM that I have learned so far in the program and I look forward to learning more as the summer progresses!

Thursday, 12 May 2016

2016 Weekly Updates

The Prairie Pest Monitoring Network's Weekly Updates are now available for the growing season.  Access the Blog to read the Posts OR access a downloadable PDF.



2016 BC Wildfire Interactive Map

A large wildfire is burning near Fort St. John BC.  Check out the interaction map showing the BC Peace. 


We are hoping the best for our growers!

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

2016 Alberta Cutworm Reporting Tool and Map

Reminder please for Albertan help!

Please ask growers to report their cutworms on the Alberta Agriculture & Forestry's live Cutworm reporting tool.


Every entry is important because it helps estimate what kind of cutworm problem we have now and into 2017.  Once data entry occurs, your growers can view the live 2016 cutworm map.


A screen shot of the live map is below (retrieved 10May2016):






And here is a screen shot of the updated map (retrieved 22Jun2016):




A summary of the nominal and economic thresholds for cutworms has been pulled together by Dr. John Gavloski who is the provincial entomologist for Manitoba.  Access the thresholds and important cutworm information here.

The Prairie Pest Monitoring Network has been posting Cutworm information and monitoring tips within the 2016 Weekly Updates which is comprised of a series of Posts updated each week during the growing season.

More information about cutworms can be found by accessing the pages from the new "Field Crop and Forage Pests and their Natural Enemies in Western Canada: Identification and Field Guide".  An excerpt of ONLY Cutworm pages from the guide have been posted as a downloadable PDF below to support in-field monitoring.

 


More information about the new guide is posted here including how to download a PDF copy of the entire guide in either English or French.

Thursday, 11 February 2016

Preparing for Spring

Here's some information and links that grower may find helpful as they start to think towards Spring.....

Link here to open our downloadable Canola Insect Scouting Chart.  You can print it but it’s also designed as a hyperlinked pdf file.  Each insect name can be clicked and it will take you directly to the page within the new “Field Crop and Forage Pests and their Natural Enemies in Western Canada”.  That complete guide is available as a free download both for printing or as an enhanced digital version.

We also encourage people to bookmark or subscribe to the Prairie Pest Monitoring Network Blog (for Weekly Updates and to access Risk & Forecast Maps produced during the grower season).  That Blog is active during the growing season.

I also mention the Manitoba Cutworm Fact Sheet with the nominal cutworm thresholds which is located at: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/insects/fad06s00.html

For Albertans, the Cutworm Reporting tool which also maps will be located in the Spring at: http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$Department/deptdocs.nsf/all/prm13779

Also keep the Syngenta flea beetle scouting pdf on hand – it’s a great visual guide to help assess percent defoliation.

Thursday, 26 November 2015

2016 Alberta Wheat Midge Forecast Map

Soil core samples were collected by several cooperators throughout Alberta this fall.  The IPM Program at AAFC-Beaverlodge contributed by surveying in the Peace River region with 12 fields sampled in Alberta plus 11 fields sampled in the BC Peace.  Thanks to Holly Spence and Arlan Benn (BC Pest Monitoring Contractor) for their efforts!


Alberta Agriculture & Forestry Staff coordinate this wheat midge surveying in Alberta.  Our soil cores were forwarded to Alberta Agriculture & Forestry's Shelley Barkley for processing. The complete summary of the results for the 2016 forecast map are posted to the Alberta Insect Pest Monitoring Network's website and was prepared by Scott Meers (Alberta Insect Management Specialist with Alberta Agriculture & Forestry).

CAUTIONS:  The 2016 forecast map does NOT replace in-field monitoring and growers are strongly cautioned against relying solely on this map to make pest management decisions!  Field scouting in wheat fields during midge emergence is the best way to assess wheat midge risk!





Acknowledgements: David Giffen (AAFC-Saskatoon) created the above map and the following list of cooperators have been recognized for their efforts in sampling all of the above data points:

Battle River Research GroupChinook Applied Research Association
Farming SmarterLakeland Applied Research Association
Mackenzie Applied Research AssociationNorthern Peace Applied Research Association
Smoky Applied Research and Demonstration AssociationMountain View County
Parkland CountyCounty of Two Hills
County of Grande PrairieMD Wainwright
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, BeaverlodgeAlberta Agriculture & Forestry technical staff

Sunday, 18 October 2015

2015 Peace River Region Annual Canola Survey

2015 Peace River Region Annual Canola Survey
Jennifer Otani1

1  Beaverlodge Research Farm, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 29, Beaverlodge AB, jennifer.otani@agr.gc.ca.

2  Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon SK.
3  BC Pest Monitoring Contactor, Dawson Creek BC. 
4  Canola Council of Canada, Beaverlodge AB.


The 2015 Annual Peace Canola Survey was completed by Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada staff based at Beaverlodge1, and Saskatoon2.  Samples were also kindly collected with help from the BC Pest Monitoring Contractor, Arlan Benn3, and Canola Council of Canada Student Assistant, Trina Drummond4.


Since 2003, the annual survey has been performed with the main objectives of (i) collecting insect pest data throughout the region and (ii) to detect introduction of the Cabbage seedpod weevil into the Peace River region.  In 2015, a total of 162 canola fields were randomly selected.  Fields were spaced approximately 10 km apart and surveying was performed through the main canola producing areas of the BC and Alberta Peace during early- to mid-flower stages.  Unfortunately, fewer fields were sampled north of 57.3° in 2015 (i.e., near Manning, LaCrete, Fort Vermilion and High Level) owing to sparse and patchy canola fields that suffered from repeated frost events and severe drought.  In 2015, sweep-net monitoring was performed in 162 commercial fields of Brassica napus (e.g., each field ≥80 acres in size) using 50 - 180° sweeps on the following dates in these areas:
  • July 5 near Grimshaw, Manning, Hawk Hills, LaCrete.
  • July 6 near Valleyview, Guy, Falher, Nampa, Peace River, Jean Cote, Girouxville.
  • July 7 near DeBolt, Grande Prairie, Bezanson, Teepee Creek, Wanham, Rycroft, Sexsmith.
  • July 8 near Fairview, Blue Sky, Berwyn, Tangent, Watino, Eaglesham, Ridge Valley, Kleskun Hills, Wembley, LaGlace, Dawson Creek, Rolla, Rose Prairie, Montney, Beaverlodge, Valhalla, Woking, Spirit River, Dunvegan, Hines Creek.
  • July 9 near Rolla, Doe River, Clayhurst, Farmington, Taylor, Baldonnel, Fort St. John, Golata Creek.
Sweep-net samples were frozen then processed to generate data for 16 species of arthropods.  Lygus specimens were identified to all five instar stages. The 2015 summary includes seven economically important pests of canola reported from 162 surveyed canola fields:


  1. Lygus (Miridae: Lygus spp.) were the most common insect pest observed in sweep-net samples collected in our 2015 surveying.  Lygus populations of ≥5 adults plus nymphs per 10 sweeps were observed in 40.1% of fields surveyed (Figure 1 and Table 1; N=162 fields).  Densities of ≥15 adults plus nymphs per 10 sweeps were recorded in 7.4% of fields surveyed (Figure 1 and Table 1).


Figure 1. Contoured map reflecting Lygus densities (adults+nymphs) in sweep-net samples collected between July 5-9, 2015, in canola fields throughout the Peace River region.





There were zero Lygus present in only 2.5% of fields surveyed (Table 1) whereas 21.6% of the canola fields contained only adult Lygus versus 75.9% of the fields that were populated by both adults and nymphs (Table 2).  Note that all nymphs collected during surveying were expected to have matured into new adults by the early pod stage.  Areas highlighted yellow, orange or red in Figure 1 may contend with Lygus with the continuation of dry, warm growing conditions typically favouring the development of Lygus nymphs to adults.  


Table 1.  Summary of Lygus densities occurring in surveyed fields in 2015.  


Lygus bugs per 10 sweeps
Number of fields
Percent of fields sampled
≥15.0
12
7.4%
10.1-15.0
11
6.8%
5.1-10.0
42
25.9%
0.1-5.0
93
57.4%
0
4
2.5%
Sum
162
100%
Table 2.  Proportion of fields surveyed containing zero Lygus, only adults, only nymphs or adults plus nymphs in commercial fields of canola in 2015.  


Lygus stages collected
Number of fields
Percent of fields sampled
No Lygus
4
2.5%
Adults only
35
21.6%
Nymphs only
0
0%
Adults + Nymphs
123
75.9%
Sum
162
100%


  1. Grasshoppers were present in 35 of 162 canola fields surveyed.  Late-instar and adult stages of two-striped, clearwinged, lesser migratory, and red legged grasshoppers were present in the sweep-net samples (listed from most numerous to least) in canola growing near Valleyview, Eaglesham, Whitemud Creek, Manning, Bluesky, Blueberry Mountain, Peace River, Ridge Valley, DeBolt, Rose Prairie, Rycroft, Hotchkiss, Savannah, Berwyn, Bonanza, Farmington, Beaverlodge, Blue Hills, Teepee Creek, Sturgeon Lake, Wembley, LaGlace, Poplar Ridge, Bridgeview, Dixonville, Tangent, Fairview, and Royce.


Click here to review the entire grasshopper protocol and biological descriptions.  Additional information related to grasshoppers can be located on Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development’s webpage located here or the BC Ministry of Agriculture’s webpage located here.


  1. Diamondback moth (Plutellidae: Plutella xylostella) were generally present in low numbers in the sweep-net samples (N=162 fields) in 2015.  Sweep-net monitoring is NOT recommended for this insect pest yet we collected a total of 672 specimens from 162 fields in 2015 compared to 230 specimens in the 206 fields in 2014 and 93.6% of the 672 specimens were DBM larvae.  Sites with higher numbers of DBM included Valleyview, Farmington, Ridge Valley, Baldonnel, Donnelly, Fort St. John, Beaverlodge, Blue Hills, and DeBolt.


It’s important to note that parasitoid wasps (e.g., Diadegma sp. and Microplitis sp.) were observed throughout the region and the presence of these natural enemies of DBM is strongly suspected to be keeping DBM densities relatively low.
Figure 2.  Presence/absence map reflecting distribution of diamondback moth (adults, larvae, pupae) occurring in sweep-net samples collected in canola from July 5-9, 2015.


  1. Root maggot (Delia sp.) adults were again prevalent in fields and were collected from 122 of the 162 sites surveyed throughout the Peace River region in 2015.  Numbers collected by sweep-net surveying ranged from 0.2-5.6 Delia sp. flies per 10 sweeps versus 0.2-10 flies per 10 sweeps in 2014 but growers should note – root assessments, rather than sweep-net monitoring, is recommended to accurately assess densities of root maggots.  More information related to root maggots in canola can be found by linking here.


  1. Normally, the annual canola survey is conducted during the initial weeks of the Bertha armyworm adult flight period so larval stages, if present, are typically very small and difficult to accurately detect and identify within the sweep-net samples.  Even so, seven of 162 fields surveyed contained early instar larvae tentatively suspected as Bertha armyworm larvae (e.g., Hawk Hills, Blue Hills, Valleyview, Guy, LaGlace and Scotswood).  It should also be noted that early instar larvae suspected as Salt Marsh Caterpillars were tentatively identified from three fields surveyed (e.g., Doe River, Clayhurst, Taylor).  


  1. Leafhoppers were observed in 69 of 162 fields yet densities were consistently low in our canola sweep-net samples in 2015.  The highest density was six per 50 sweeps in a canola field near Fort Vermilion and near Bezanson.  More information related to leafhopper biology and monitoring can be found by linking here.


  1. We are again happy to report that zero cabbage seedpod weevil (Curculionidae: Ceutorhynchus obstrictus) were observed in the 162 fields sampled in the Peace River region in 2015.  Approximately nine small weevils measuring <4mm in length and <20 beetles measuring <5mm in length were retained from the survey samples for forwarding to the National Identification System (AAFC-Ottawa) for species confirmation.


  1. Previous cropping data was recorded by visually inspecting the soil surface of surveyed canola fields.  Surface field trash was categorized then summarized in the figure below (Note: category “cereal” was used to describe fields where the previous crop was either barley or wheat yet no seed was readily observed nor was the straw sufficiently intact to determine the presence/absence of auricles).  


The most frequently observed soil surface stubble encountered beneath surveyed canola fields in 2015 was wheat stubble, followed by barley, residue that was characterized as “cereal”, canola, peas, oats with single fields of stubble remaining from creeping red fescue, left fallow, or tilled (N=158 fields).  


Figure 3. Field surface condition or stubble type observed in canola fields surveyed in the Peace River region in 2015.


THANK YOU to the following hard working AAFC staff who surveyed†, processed‡, and mapped∞ this data:  Owen Olfert2†∞, Ross Weiss2†∞, Shelby Dufton1†‡, Amanda Jorgensen1†‡, Holly Spence1†‡,  Andras Szeitz1†‡, Jadin Chahade1†‡, and Kaitlin Freeman1†‡.  

Finally, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, Thank you to our canola producers for allowing us to sample in their fields!  

Previous survey summaries can be accessed here.